>>157762252 (OP)
Казаки это просто бандиты в пограничных районах россии и польши.

Max Vasmer's etymological dictionary traces the name to the Old East Slavic word козакъ, kozak, a loanword from Cuman, in which cosac meant "free man".[21] The ethnonym Kazakh is from the same Turkic root.[22][23][24][incomplete short citation]

In written sources the name is first attested in Codex Cumanicus from the 13th century.[25][26] In English, "Cossack" is first attested in 1590.[22]

It is not clear when new Slavic people apart from Brodnici and Berladniki started settling in the lower reaches of major rivers such as the Don and the Dnieper after the demise of the Khazar state. It is unlikely it could have happened before the 13th century, when the Mongols broke the power of the Cumans, who had assimilated the previous population on that territory. It is known that new settlers inherited a lifestyle that persisted there long before, such as those of the Turkic Cumans and the Circassian Kassaks.[27] However, Slavic settlements in Southern Ukraine started to appear relatively early during the Cuman rule, with the earliest ones, like Oleshky, dating back to the 11th century.

Early "Proto-Cossack" groups are generally reported to have come into existence within the present-day Ukraine in the mid-13th century as the influence of Cumans grew weak though some have ascribed their origins to as early as the tenth century.[28] Some historians suggest that the Cossack people were of mixed ethnic origins, descending from Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Turks, Tatars, and others who settled or passed through the vast Steppe.[29] However some Turkologists argue that Cossacks are descendants of native Cumans of Ukraine, who lived there long ago before the Mongol invasion.[30]

In the midst of the growing Moscow and Lithuanian powers, new political entities had appeared in the region such as Moldavia and the Crimean Khanate. In 1261 some Slavic people living in the area between the Dniester and the Volga were mentioned in Ruthenian chronicles. Historical records of the Cossacks before the 16th century are scant as the history of the Ukrainian lands in that period for various reasons.

As early as the 15th century a few individuals ventured into the proverbial "Wild Fields", the southern frontier regions of Ukraine separating Poland-Lithuania from the Crimean Khanate, which was a naturally rich and fertile region teeming with cattle, wild animals, and fish. These ventures went on short-term expeditions to acquire the region's natural wealth and this mode of existing—farming, hunting, then returning home in the winter or perhaps remaining permanently—came to be known as the Cossack way of life.[31]


Ottoman Turks in battle against the Cossacks, 1592
In the 15th century, the Cossack society was described as a loose federation of independent communities, often forming local armies, entirely independent from the neighbouring states (of, for example, Poland, the Grand Duchy of Moscow or the Khanate of Crimea).[32] According to Hrushevsky the first mention of Cossacks could be found already in the 14th century; however, they were either of Turkic or of undefined origin.[33] Hrushevsky states that Cossacks could have descended from the long forgotten Antes, or groups from the Berlad territory in present-day Romania, then a part of the Grand Duchy of Halych, Brodniki. There, Cossacks may have served as self-defense formations, organized to defend against raids conducted by neighbors. By 1492, the Crimean Khan complained that Kanev and Cherkasy Cossacks attacked his ship near Tighina (Bender), and the Grand Duke of Lithuania Alexander I promised to find the guilty among the Cossacks. Sometime in the 16th century there appeared the old Ukrainian Ballad of Cossack Holota about a Cossack near Kiliya.[34][35]

By the 16th century these Cossack societies merged into two independent territorial organisations as well as other smaller, still detached groups:

The Cossacks of Zaporizhia, centered on the lower bends of Dnieper, inside the territory of modern Ukraine, with the fortified capital of Zaporozhian Sich. They were formally recognised as an independent state, the Zaporozhian Host, by a treaty with Poland in 1649.
The Don Cossack State, on the river Don. The capital of the Don Cossack State was initially Razdory, then moved to Cherkassk, later moved to Novocherkassk.
In addition to these two, one finds mention of the less well-known Tatar Cossacks such as Nağaybäklär and Meschera (mishari) Cossacks, of whom Sary Azman was the first Don ataman and which not only were assimilated by Don Cossacks, but had their own irregular Bashkir and Meschera Host up to the end of the 19th century.[36] Kalmyk and Buryat Cossacks should be mentioned as well.[37] The Gypsy Cossacks are the least known ones now.

>>157762252 (OP)
>Казаки - это обрусевшие тюрки и монголы, которые со временем смешались с восточными славянами?
Ага. А ковбои - американизированные индейцы. А конкистадоры - испанизированные ацтеки. Ты хохол или просто любитель псевдоистории?

The origins of the first Cossacks are Slavic,[1] in 1710 Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk confirmed Khazar origin.[2][3] The Academician Zabelin mentioned that peoples of the prairies and of the woods had always needed "a live frontier", and even ancient Borisphenites and Tanaites could be the predecessors of Cossacks,[4] not only Khazars, which assimilated/included Severians, Goths, Scythians and other ancient inhabitants, as insisted by the Cossack folklore, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik, and numerous Cossack historians. Because of the need of both the Reds and the anti-Bolshevik forces to deny any Cossack ethnicity, the traditional post-imperial historiography dates the emergence of Cossacks to the 14th-15th centuries. Non-mainstream theories, however, have lent the date 948 from imperial historiography, and ascribed an earlier Cossack existence to the tenth century, but denied Cossack links to both "the old people" (Khazars) and "the new people" (Russians and Ukrainians; the very terms "old people" and "new people" being coined by Metropolitan Ilarion.) [5] specifically mentioning 948 as the year when the inhabitants of the Steppe under the leader named Kasak or Kazak routed the Khazars from the area of modern Kuban and organized a state called Kazakia or Cossackia.[6]

Some historians suggest that the Cossack people were of mixed ethnic origins, descending from Turks, Tatars, Russians, Ukrainians and others who settled or passed through the vast Steppe that stretches from Asia to southern Europe.[7]

However some Turkologists argue that Cossacks are descendants of native Kipchak (Russian половцы) people of Ukraine, who inhabited the area long before the Mongol invasion and were closely related to modern Kazakhs. These people were highly admired for their esquestrian skills by the early Russian military. Many were hired as cavalry by Russian and Ukrainian warlords, in much the same way that they hired Black Klobuks as personal guards[citation needed].

It is after 1400 that the Cossacks emerge as an established and identifiable group in historical accounts. Rulers of the Grand Duchy of Moscow and the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth employed Cossacks as mobile guards against Tatar raids from the south in the territories of present-day southwestern Russia and southern Ukraine. Those early Cossacks seemed to have included a significant number of Tatar descendants judging by the records of their names. From the mid-15th century, Cossacks are mostly mentioned with Russian and Ukrainian names.[8]

In all historical records of that period, Cossack society was described as a loose federation of independent communities, often merging into larger units of a military character, entirely separate from, and mostly independent of, other nations (such as Poland, Russia or the Tatars)[citation needed].

In the 16th century, these Cossack societies created two relatively independent territorial organisations:

Zaporizhia (Zaporozhie), on the lower bends of the river Dnieper in the Ukraine, between Russia, Poland and the Tatars of the Crimea, with the center, Zaporizhian Sich;
The Don Cossack State, on the river Don, separated from the Russian State by the rebel Nogai and Tatar tribes.

>>157762627
Вообще то сейчас это общепринятая версия

Предки были казаками оно и не мудрено, на Кубани живу. В основном все хохлы, греки да горцы всякие, может даже немного турок хотя по моему виду не сказать, что я хач. Важно только то, что казаки были свободными людьми. А национальность не имеет никакого значения. В казачество шли отовсюду подневольные крестьяне, который становились там сами себе хозяевами.

>>157762888
В россии почти все население было свободным. ТЫ и сейчас оброк платишь царю, если что, ты раб? Казаки это бандиты, не этническая группа.

>>157762713
Принятая в каком манямирке?

>>157762888
Ну и я о чем. Служивое сословие свободных людей. Обычно различные манятеоретики, кстати, обсираются, когда узнают о Сибирском казачьем войске, Оренбургском, Яицком и т.д.

>>157763045
>почти все население было свободным
ебанутый? 99% были крепостными рабами

>>157763105
почитай английскую википедию и другие достоверные источники

>>157763144
>99% были крепостными рабами
Процентов 20 максимум населения страны на момент 1861 года. Это если считать именно помещичье землевладение. Потому что церковных и царских крестьян относить к тру-крепостным неверно: у них объем прав, свобод и привилегий был чуть ли не больше, чем у тру-свободных.

>>157763174
Почитал, нихуя нового для себя не открыл. Жители фронтира, которые получали землю и свободу за приграничную службу. Национальный состав - в основном русские, но так-то брали кого угодно.

Почему хохлы и кубаноиды так гордятся свими "казацкими корнями"? Многие стараются отделить себя от остальных славян, рассказывая какую-то антинаучную хуиту про то что у казаков нет "гена рабства" и прочий высер.

>>157764545
Потому что хохлы это татары

Казаки это же те же самые ауе-быдлоиды того времени?

>>157764545
Быть русским - зашквар.

Казаки- вольный народ, которому не гоже работать. Даже нельзя назвать "службой" царю служат только рабы лол. На границах империи просто нехуй было делать, поэтому от скуки "воевали за идею" с турками и прочими бесами.
От такой жизни и характер соответствующий лютый похуизм в одних сферах, и дикая агрессия в других. Сам даже за собой замечаю такое дерьмо.
Конечно, изначально Казаки - русские люди. Но сейчас слишком много намешано, как раз из-за проживания на краю Империи. Про Кубанских и Терских казаков точно скажу, что в каждом есть кровь
и чурок, и хохлов.


Эксперт кубанского казачества, потомственный казак в 6 поколении итт

>>157768980
>потомственный казак в 6 поколении
какой профит дает? работу проще найти или налоговые льготы от государства?
по синьке всем подряд тычешь своим казачеством?

>>157769251
мой прадед похерил прямую связь с казачеством после революции конечно, сам же понимаешь,
красная власть вырезала казаков тоннами, поэтому никаких бумаг на эту тему нет. А когда это восстанавливать стали в крае, то дедушка уже сказал "да пошли они нахуй, эти ряженные". Так что, сегодня казаки- это фарс, 90% самые обычные понторезы пидорахообразные, любящие побухать, поорать "ЛЮБО БАТЬКА АТАМАН, ЛЮБО". А копы (казачий отдел полиции) абсолютно состоит из долбоебов-недоппс.

Собственно, сам понимаешь, хуйня это всё. Только ради "тему поддержать"

>>157769620
Очем ты? Я в падике уже лет пятнадцать не бухал.

>>157769971
Боевые вэбмки же.